Search This Blog

Tuesday, December 28, 2010

NATURAL RESOURCES = NATIONAL SECURITY

With special thanks we highlight the outstanding OpEd in Today's Times of India written by Michael Kugelman of WWICS. http://bit.ly/eCNLkq    PGI has been promoting this same message over the years in many of its installments, DPR's and at speaking engagements.  Economic data sets forecast India's growth -if unchecked- will rapidly deplete natural resources and further advance climatic change.  PGI's on-the-ground observations suggest the present stress on ecology, biodiversity, and social-environmental services are far more advanced than officially reported.  This finding suggests that economist forecasts are based on overvalued and misleading data; thus the timetable to tipping point accelerated.  PGI will be releasing in early 2011 a report to TEEB and UNGC regarding these findings, ie. the problem that imperfect information is masking what is rapidly becoming a crisis condition that threatens then entire breakdown of the security of India's natural capital reserves and services.

In sum, the growth of India's national economy versus its natural services economy do not need to be a zero sum game. However it will take a massive paradigm shift in policy and broader cultural norms.   India's drive to break the 10% GDP glass ceiling has resulted in the construction of a precarious tower built on thin foundation.  The architects of this metaphorical tower -by and large- pay lip service to conservation and CSR and moreover exclude India's massive rural population to the margins of economic sustenance. A true understanding of this dynamic supports Kugelman's observation that the rise of extremism is secondary to the lack of integration of local communities "in the fruits of ...resource extraction" and human right grievances that leave locals in "toxic living conditions."  The longer natural resource management is ignored and populations marginalized, the deeper and wider the divide will become between those enjoying economic prosperity and those being denied same. 

A retreat from the brink requires sweeping and revolutionary plans and facilitation of sustainable industry practices and processes particularly re human equality and conservation of water/ biodiversity. Couple this with broadbased education re the value of conservation and energy saving measures, and a more pyramidal national growth and security (based on sustainability) could be achieved. One that preserves natural capital and promotes human equality.  Failure to do so may have dramatic impact on the long term story of India's rise that- as PM Singh stated 'history will judge harshly.'  Due to the scale of India as a population and economy, any change would need to emerge from scaled grassroots initiatives, supported and networked through medium services and complimented by government incentives. The good news is India is historically famous for improbable and en mass migration of norms and beliefs.

-PGI is a UN Global Compact service provider in the business of designing and facilitating industries based on the precepts of the UN Millennium Goal Global Compact.  It's latest project is an efficiency-by-design vertically integrated private company for the propagation, production and world wide marketing of bamboo consumables from Arunachal Pradesh.  It will be the first of its kind, and the centerpiece of PGI's 2011 agribusiness initiative, Eco-Logical Fox. The company will be unvieled in January 2011 via press release. For more information write info@peerlessgreen.net

Below is a reprint of TOI Dec 28, 2010 OpEd:


A Crucial Connection



India can hardly overstress the link tying natural resources to national security

Michael Kugelman

With India’s soaring growth and rising global clout hogging media headlines, it is easy to forget the nation is beset by security challenges. Naxalite insurgency rages across more than two-thirds of India’s states, while long-simmering tensions in J&K exploded once again this summer. Meanwhile, two years post-Mumbai, Pakistan remains unwilling or unable to dismantle the anti-India militant groups on its soil. Finally, China’s military rise continues unabated. As Beijing increases its activities across the Himalayan and Indian Ocean regions, fears about Chinese encirclement are rife.

It is even easier to forget that these challenges are intertwined with natural resource issues. Policy makers in New Delhi often fail to make this connection, at their own peril. Twenty-five per cent of Indians lack access to clean drinking water; about 40 per cent have no electricity. These constraints intensify security problems.

India’s immense energy needs – household and commercial – have deepened its dependence on coal, its most heavily consumed energy source. But India’s main coal reserves are located in Naxalite bastions. With energy security at stake, New Delhi has a powerful incentive to flush out insurgents. It has done so with heavy-handed shows of force that often trigger civilian casualties. Additionally, intensive coal mining has displaced locals and created toxic living conditions for those who remain. All these outcomes boost support for the insurgency.

Meanwhile, the fruits of this heavy resource extraction elude local communities, fuelling grievances that Naxalites exploit. A similar dynamic plays out in J&K, where electricity-deficient residents decry the paltry proportion of power they receive from central government-owned hydroelectric companies. In both cases, resource inequities are a spark for violent anti-government fervour.

Resource constraints also inflame India’s tensions with Pakistan and China. As economic growth and energy demand have accelerated, India has increased its construction of hydropower projects on the western rivers of

the Indus Basin – waters that, while allocated to Pakistan by the Indus Waters Treaty, may be harnessed by India for run-of-theriver hydro facilities. Pakistani militants, however, do not make such distinctions. Lashkar-e-Taiba repeatedly lashes out at India’s alleged “water theft”. Lashkar, capitalising on Pakistan’s acute water crisis (it has Asia’s lowest per capita water availability), may well use water as a pretext for future attacks on India.

Oil and natural gas are resource catalysts for conflict with China. Due to insufficient energy supplies at home, India is launching aggressive efforts to secure hydrocarbons abroad. This race brings New Delhi into fierce competition with Beijing, whose growing presence in the Indian Ocean region is driven in large part by its own search for natural resources.

India’s inability to prevent Chinese energy deals with Myanmar (and its worries about similar future arrangements in Sri Lanka) feeds fears about Chinese encirclement, but also emboldens India to take its energy hunt further afield. Strategists now cite the protection of faraway future energy holdings as a core motivation for naval modernisation plans; India’s energy investments already extend from the Middle East and Africa to Latin America. Such reach exposes India to new vulnerabilities, underscoring the imperative of enhanced sea-based energy transit protection capabilities.

While sea-related China-India tensions revolve around energy, land-based discord is tied to water. South Asia holds less than 5 per cent of annual global renewable water resources, but China-India border tensions centre around the region’s rare water-rich areas, particularly Arunachal Pradesh. Additionally, Chinese dam-building on Tibetan Plateau rivers – including the mighty Brahmaputra – alarms lower-riparian India. With many Chinese agricultural areas water-scarce, and India supporting nearly 20 per cent of the world’s population with only 4 per cent of its water, neither nation takes such disputes lightly.

India’s resource constraints, impelled by population growth and climate change, will likely worsen in the years ahead. Recent estimates envision water deficits of 50 per cent by 2030 and outright scarcity by 2050, if not earlier. Meanwhile, India is expected to become the world’s third-largest energy consumer by 2030, when the country could import 50 per cent of its natural gas and a staggering 90 per cent of its oil. If such projections prove accurate, the impact on national security could be devastating.

So what can be done? First, New Delhi must integrate natural resource considerations into security policy and planning. India’s navy, with its goal of developing a blue-water force to safeguard energy resources overseas, has planted an initial seed. Yet much more must be done, and progress can be made only when policy makers better understand the destabilising effects of resource constraints. Second, India should acknowledge its poor resource governance, and craft demandside, conservation-based policies that better manage precious – but not scarce – resources. This means improved maintenance of water infrastructure (40 per cent of water in most Indian cities is lost to pipeline leaks), more equitable resource allocations, and stronger incentives for implementing water- and energy-efficient technologies (like drip irrigation) and policies (like rainwater harvesting).

Such steps will not make India’s security challenges disappear, but they will make the security situation less perilous. And they will move the country closer to the day when resource efficiency and equity join military modernisation and counterinsurgency as India’s security watchwords.

The writer is programme associate for South Asia at the Woodrow Wilson International Centre for Scholars in Washington, DC.


Fair Use Notice: This post contains copyrighted material that has not been authorized by the copyright owners. PGI believes this educational use on the Green Eye Web-blog constitutes a fair use of the copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.) If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Fair Use notwithstanding we will immediately comply with any copyright owner who wants their material removed or modified or wants us to link to their web site which we routinely do as a business practice notwithstanding.

Saturday, November 27, 2010

THANK YOU MR EXEC SEC CBD AHMED DJOGHLAF

Message

by Mr Ahmed Djoghlaf

The Executive Secretary of the
Convention on Biological Diversity

on the occasion of  the seminar “BANANAS AND BAMBOO”: Biodiversity management of at risk commercially valuable crops through community-technology integration

29-30 november 2010

KOLKATA, INDIA

Please accept my sincere thanks for including me in this important event as a part of the International Year of Biodiversity celebrations. I would also like to thank Lady Brabourne College and Peerless Green Initiatives for organizing and hosting this unique event.

For the last 11 months, the world has been celebrating the International Day for Biological Diversity, and this year, the focus is on Biodiversity, Development and Poverty Alleviation. Celebration of this theme provides a unique opportunity to raise public awareness on the importance of biodiversity to sustainable development and the attainment of the Millennium Development Goals. These three aspects are inextricably linked to each other, and more importantly in this case, to agriculture. Poor rural communities depend on biodiversity and ecosystem services for health and nutrition, for crop development, and as a safety net when faced with climate variability and natural disasters. Agricultural biodiversity provides humans with food and raw materials for goods - such as cotton for clothing, wood for shelter and fuel, plants and roots for medicines, and materials for biofuels - and with incomes and livelihoods, including those derived from subsistence farming. Agricultural biodiversity also performs ecosystem services such as soil and water conservation, maintenance of soil fertility and biota, and pollination, all of which are essential to human survival. In addition, genetic diversity of agricultural biodiversity provides species with the ability to adapt to changing environment and evolve, by increasing their tolerance to frost, high temperature, drought and water-logging, as well as their resistance to particular diseases, pests and parasites for example.



During the last decades, worldwide biodiversity has been lost at an unprecedented rate in all the ecosystems, including agro-ecosystems. Homogenization of agricultural production systems, mainly due to intensification of agricultural systems coupled with specialization by plant and animals breeders and the harmonizing effects of globalization, is one of the greatest causes of agricultural biodiversity loss, through genetic erosion and the increasing levels of genetic vulnerability of specialized crops and livestock. According to the FAO, it is estimated that about three-quarters of the genetic diversity found in agricultural crops has been lost over the last century, and this genetic erosion continues. For example, today, 90% of our food energy and protein comes from only 15 plant and 8 animal species, with disturbing consequences for nutrition and food security. Wheat, rice and maize alone provide more than 50% of the global plant-based energy intake. In addition to agricultural biodiversity, modern agricultural practices can also impact biodiversity in other ecosystems through several ways such as unsustainable demands on water, overgrazing, as well as excessive use of nutrients and chemical inputs to control weeds, pests and diseases that result in problems of pollution and eutrophication. Furthermore, land and habitat conversion to large-scale agricultural production also cause significant loss of biodiversity.



Biodiversity and agriculture are strongly interrelated because while biodiversity is critical for agriculture, agriculture can also contribute to conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity. Indeed, sustainable agriculture both promotes and is enhanced by biodiversity. Maintenance of this biodiversity is essential for the sustainable production of food and other agricultural products and the benefits these provide to humanity, including food security, nutrition and livelihoods. The major challenge for agriculture is to ensure food security, adequate nutrition and stable livelihoods for all, now and in the future, by increasing food production while adopting sustainable and efficient agriculture, sustainable consumption of resources, and landscape-level planning to ensure the preservation of biodiversity. On the positive side, over the past few decades agriculture has made enormous contributions to feeding the planet and lifting people out of poverty. Farmers have also played the leading role in maintaining the agricultural biodiversity we still have and many have made genuine efforts to reduce the impact of farming. However, the recently-released third edition of the Convention on Biological Diversity‟s Global Biodiversity Outlook – a wide-ranging synthesis of the state of biodiversity today – shows that the nations of the world have individually and collectively failed to meet the 2010 Biodiversity Target. We continue to drive species extinct at up to 1,000 times the natural background rate. We therefore need to do more, and I am hopeful that today’s debate will provide for an exchange of best practices as well as inspiration for further concrete action.



The Convention on Biological Diversity and I share your concern about biodiversity issues as they relate to agriculture and we are involved in helping member parties to not only be aware of this growing problem, but also to take the next step; action. The CBD programme of work on agricultural biological diversity works to promote the positive effects and mitigate the negative impacts of agricultural practices as well as the conservation and sustainable use of genetic resources of actual and potential value for food and agriculture. Biodiversity is the basis of agriculture. It has enabled farming systems to evolve ever since agriculture was first developed some 10,000 years ago. Biodiversity is the origin of all species of crops and domesticated livestock and the variety within them. It is also the foundation of ecosystem services essential to sustain agriculture and human well-being. Today's crop and livestock biodiversity are the result of many thousands years of human intervention.



Preserving agricultural biodiversity and plant genetic resources plays a large role in the Convention’s 2011-2020 Strategic Plan, which was recently adopted at COP10 in Nagoya, Japan. Also the adoption of an international protocol on Access and Benefit Sharing, has given greater legal certainty and clarity to both users and providers of genetic resources by providing an incentive for public and private sector research while ensuring that a fair and equitable share of benefits arising from this research accrues to the countries providing the genetic resources. These decisions demonstrates the international community’s commitment to the preservation of biodiversity in all its forms.



The 2010 International Year of Biodiversity offers a unique opportunity to ensure that the voice of farmers, speaking in unison for life on Earth and the future of humanity, is heard far and wide. I therefore commend you for your participation in today’s meeting. Mahatma Gandhi, that great defender of farmers, famously said: “The difference between what we do and what we are capable of doing would suffice to solve most of the world's problem.” These words need to motivate our actions from now until end of 2010 and beyond. By redoubling our efforts over the coming months and years, I am sure that we will be able to preserve agricultural biodiversity, and thus help to protect our future wellbeing and prosperity. As the slogan of the International Year reminds us, “Biodiversity is life…biodiversity is OUR life.”



Fair Use Notice: This post contains copyrighted material that has not been authorized by the copyright owners. PGI believes this educational use on the Green Eye Web-blog constitutes a fair use of the copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.) If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Fair Use notwithstanding we will immediately comply with any copyright owner who wants their material removed or modified or wants us to link to their web site which we routinely do as a business practice notwithstanding.

THE LIVING BRIDGES OF ASSAM

During our study of the bamboo industry in Assam, we became aware of the famous Umshiang Double-Decker Root Bridge in Cherrapunji, near city of Shillong. The native inhabitants for time immemorial have trained the secondary root system of a ficus elastica (rubber) tree and the result is a truly 'green' living bridge. The Khasis use hollowed betel nut trunks to channel the rubber tree roots to the far side of the river where they are rooted.


For PGI, these bridges have become a very special icon of our core values: The merger of respect for traditional knowledge, an overlay of technology and utility existing within nature not against it. PGI's field economist, Rajendran mused whether the natural capital value of this particular tree is more than other trees. What a wonderful question. It makes us realize that the utility of natural capital resources (whether a bridge or not) service mankind, and with proper care we can be economically viable while servicing nature. Win-win. Value chain. Sustainability. It is the metaphorical bridge that we in the Eco-facilitation industry must act as foreperson. At PGI we are committed to channelling the inspirations of Social NGOs, Institutes and Tech scientists into the commercial CSR and the consumer mainstream... to literally implement and grow the sturdy and durable bridge leading to our common evergreen existence.






Thanks to Atlas Obscura for the great pictures...way better than any of us took!

Fair Use Notice: This post contains copyrighted material that has not been authorized by the copyright owners. PGI believes this educational use on the Green Eye Web-blog constitutes a fair use of the copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.) If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Fair Use notwithstanding we will immediately comply with any copyright owner who wants their material removed or modified or wants us to link to their web site which we routinely do as a business practice notwithstanding.

Monday, November 22, 2010

PGI: Millenium Compact Acceptance Letter

Dear Peerless Green Initiatives,


Welcome to the United Nations Global Compact. We are pleased to inform you that Peerless Green Initiatives has been added to our register of participants: http://unglobalcompact.org/participant/12629

Thank you for joining our corporate responsibility initiative - the world's largest with over 8,000 business and non-business participants in 135 countries. An official welcome letter and information package will be sent to your organization's top executive via mail. Please allow 3 to 6 weeks for delivery.


Expectations of Participation

As a participant, Peerless Green Initiatives commits to:

* Set in motion changes to business operations so that the UN Global Compact and our Ten Principles become part of strategy, culture and day-to-day operations, including in subsidiaries and the supply chain;

* Advocate the UN Global Compact and the Ten Principles via available communications channels; and

* Communicate annually with your stakeholders on efforts to implement the UN Global Compact principles, and post this Communication on Progress (COP) on the UN Global Compact website. Failure to post a COP annually will result in loss of an "active" status in the UN Global Compact, and eventual removal from the initiative.

New participants are urged to review the Communication on Progress section of the UN Global Compact website. Information can be found on: minimum requirements for the COP; guidance on creating, sharing and posting a COP; and practical examples of how companies are communicating progress.

A resource library is available on our website to aid UN Global Compact participants in implementing the Ten Principles, engaging in partnerships and communicating progress on corporate responsibility actions.

Local Networks

We encourage your company - and any subsidiaries, if relevant - to engage in Global Compact Local Networks, which can be found in over 80 countries. Within a local context, these networks provide opportunities for participants to improve understanding and share experiences on the Ten Principles and partnerships, as well as how to report on progress in these areas. Collective action campaigns and government policy dialogues are also organized through the Local Networks. More information can be found in the "Local Networks" section of our website:


Sincerely,

The Global Compact Office

United Nations Global Compact

Two United Nations Plaza

New York, NY 10017

Email: globalcompact@un.org

Website: http://www.unglobalcompact.org/




Fair Use Notice: This post contains copyrighted material that has not been authorized by the copyright owners. PGI believes this educational use on the Green Eye Web-blog constitutes a fair use of the copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.) If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Fair Use notwithstanding we will immediately comply with any copyright owner who wants their material removed or modified or wants us to link to their web site which we routinely do as a business practice notwithstanding.

Sunday, November 14, 2010

India's Landmark Energy Reduction Program to Launch April 2011

NEW BUZZWORD: SAVING ENERGY

(India) firms are gearing up for a new green regime called PAT (perform, achieve, trade). This will ensure that smoke-spewing manufacturing units bring down their energy intensity. The scheme would also produce a
75,000-crore (1.8 Trillion USD) energy efficiency market by 2015 in India

Namrata Singh
Times News Network http://www.timesofindia.com/

Century Group, the Rs 5,000-crore diversified conglomerate owned by B K Birla, has now turned its focus on how its units—comprising textiles, cement, pulp & paper and viscose filament yarn—could be made more energy efficient. The concern is not restricted to Century Group alone. All manufacturers are looking at ways to bring down energy intensity at their respective units.

A year ago, perhaps, one would have linked this overdrive to costcutting measures which companies had undertaken. Even today, cost reduction ranks high on every management’s agenda, but the reasons to achieve higher energy efficiency have changed. Energy audits are being carried out more aggressively than ever before, thanks to the energy efficiency scheme, PAT (perform, achieve,

trade), announced by the Bureau of Energy Efficiency (BEE), the nodal agency spearheading the energy efficiency programme in India.

The plan is to give specific energy efficiency targets to every sector in the industry through PAT. “Companies will be given specific energy reduction targets which they will have to meet in three years. They can meet their targets either by bringing about changes in their manufacturing processes to reduce energy intensity or by purchasing energy saving certificates from the market. We will design a scheme in such a way so that there can be early price discovery,” said Ajay Mathur, director general, BEE.

After the three-year period, if a company meets the benchmark and exceeds the target, it would be issued energy saving certificates or ESCerts. However, if a company fails to meet the target, it will have to purchase ESCerts from other companies to bridge the gap. For a company which has a relatively new plant (new plants are more energy efficient than old ones), it would be easy to meet the target and earn ESCerts, which can then be traded with older plants that fell short of their energy efficiency targets. Given the global urgency on matters such as climate change—and PAT is only one step in the direction of reducing the country’s energy intensity—companies are keen to figure out the exact quantum of their units in the new scheme of things.

PAT is scheduled to be launched in April 2011. This will be done in consultation with individual units. The sectors to be covered by PAT are: aluminum, cement, iron and

steel, chlor alkali, thermal, power plants, fertilizer, pulp & paper, textiles and railways. These, by and large, cover all sectors that directly or indirectly trigger climate change.

BEE has already kicked off the process and is consulting industry bodies to get their views on the proposed format. Climate change consultants have swung into action to assist companies in need of information on how the scheme would work and how price discovery would occur. Clearly, trading of ESCerts will create a parallel market dealing with climate change, independent of the Kyoto Protocol. Under Kyoto Protocol’s clean development mechanism (part of UN Framework Convention on Climate Change), Indian companies—which got their projects registered—were issued carbon credits for offsetting greenhouse gas emissions.

Although trading under PAT will be restricted to the domestic market, industryexperts are talking big money for the kind of market it will create. “Overall, the scheme could generate an energy efficiency market of Rs 75,000 crore by 2015 in India,” said Vivek Dhariwal, senior consultant, EVI, a carbon market consultant. The scheme aims to achieve a 5% reduction in overall energy consumption by industries in three years i.e. during 2011-14. After the end of the first phase, each industry will submit its PAT assessment document, stating the reduction in their specific energy consumption. This report will be validated by an agency designated by BEE.

According to Anmol Singh Jaggi, director, Gensol Carbon Consultants, “After the benchmarks are set, for one year there will be no trading of ESCerts. Companies will be given time to adapt to the benchmarks of energy efficiency. Trading will begin after that.”

Manufacturing companies feel that energy efficiency is not a new concept for them-it is something they have always endeavoured to achieve. “We are constantly looking at ways of reducing energy costs, either through specific modifications or replacements. We also get audits done to assist us in the process. So energy efficiency is not a new thing,” said RK Dalmia, president, Century Textiles.

Consultants, however, believe that companies would have to get their act together to become PATprepared. According to P Ram Babu, CEO, General Carbon Advisory Services, companies would need to establish a robust baseline of energy footprint. They would also need to focus on a continuous process improvement to meet and exceed specific energy consumption targeting. “For this, companies need to graduate from an audit-oriented approach in their energy management to a process-based performance improvement approach,” said Ram Babu. Dhariwal of EVI foresees an important role played by the private sector in the implementation of the various measures. “We, at EVI, are geared now for offering such solutions to our clients,” said Dhariwal.

It is becoming increasingly evident that the Indian industry needs to look at reduction of emissions beyond those supported by projectbased offset generation such as CDM. “While the project-based emission reduction offset generation enables industries to lap up those opportunities which are not viable without revenue from offset sale, the opportunities of becoming energy and emission efficient on other fronts remain untapped,” said Ram Babu.

National actions like the creation of a PAT-type mechanism lead to added risk for those who do not manage their energy-and hence emissions-wisely and reward those who perform well on this front. This will ensure that industries continually undertake a disciplined process-based approach to optimize, reduce energy/specific consumption and, thereby, systematically reduce emission over a period of time.

Given the complexities, it seems like companies have no choice but to work out their math on energy efficiency well in advance. And accounting consultants are more than willing to help firms unearth opportunities to not just meet the target but exceed them to capitalize on opportunities to earn energy efficiency assets.

JSW Steel, for one, has hired one of the big four consultants to conduct a study to assess its carbon footprint to be benchmarked against the best in the world. “We understand that we are 20% higher (than the benchmark), but that may not be as bad based on Indian standards of energy efficiency. We are making an effort to bring it down by 20%,” said Seshagiri Rao, joint managing director, JSW Steel.
***

PGI is an Indo-American facilitation group specializing in the migration of technology and sustainable processes that promote ecology, economy and equality. For questions or interest in the PAT program: info@peerlessgreen.net subject PAT

Fair Use Notice: This post contains copyrighted material that has not been authorized by the copyright owners. PGI believes this educational use on the Green Eye Web-blog constitutes a fair use of the copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.) If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Fair Use notwithstanding we will immediately comply with any copyright owner who wants their material removed or modified or wants us to link to their web site which we routinely do as a business practice notwithstanding.

Friday, November 12, 2010

The Plague of Gender Inequality

PGI's media department has a daily ritual of scanning news sources in our target area of South India for issues germane to our initiatives. Occasionally they find something that is not exactly on point, but somehow is on point. Today we clipped a QA column wherein readers ask the columnist lawyer a question.  The question related to distribution of a father's real property among his six children.  That's not the interesting issue. It was the way in which the question was asked, that was begging a certain answer. The six children were specifically identified as four sons and two daughters. The rest of the question went through the lines of consanguinity regarding only the daughters...one deceased with a surviving daughter, the other with a daughter who had one child, also a girl.

The author of the question does not come right out and ask whether the sons' claim somehow trump the daughters' claim, but it's clearly implied.  In fact, the question could be rewritten without reference to gender and it would have been exactly the same question.  This is disturbing and is reflective of the social acceptability of making gender differentiation when it is not material nor relevant. (Otherwise, the questioner would have never sent his question to a widely circulated newspaper.) Dodging the issue, the column lawyer plainly cites the (gender neutral) law splits estates in equal shares. Period. Full stop.  But law is not always the mind of its culture. 

In juxtaposition, we were also pleased to find in today's news that the India Supreme Court is taking a firm position on 'dowry deaths' (more accurately dowry murders) and the recent inexplicable rise of the barberous act of husbands dousing their spouses (and sometimes children) with kerosene and lighting them afire.

PGI sincerely urges all readers to visit the new UN website "Every Woman, Every Child" http://www.everywomaneverychild.org/pages?pageid=3 and get involved.  Nearly every project we have worked on and reviewed has always had an underlying gender issue that was in need of address.  There is much work to be done on this front. There are some tremendous stories of success (such as woman self help groups and financial clubs) but these are too few, far between. The process of global gender equality must be accelerated for the preservation of society and humanity on our ever crowding planet.



Fair Use Notice: This post contains copyrighted material that has not been authorized by the copyright owners. PGI believes this educational use on the Green Eye Web-blog constitutes a fair use of the copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.) If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Fair Use notwithstanding we will immediately comply with any copyright owner who wants their material removed or modified or wants us to link to their web site which we routinely do as a business practice notwithstanding.

Thursday, November 11, 2010

IYBD Kolkata Nov 29-30 2010

Elephant eating banana plants on a West Tamil Nadu farm
DIVERSITY MANAGEMENT OF AT RISK COMMERCIALLY VALUABLE CROPS THROUGH COMMUNITY and TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION

Focus on “BANANA & BAMBOO”

The Challenges of Agriculture in a Crowded World: Balancing Stakeholder Interests Through Integrated Networks and Processes

-Peerless Green Initiatives
Initiative Eco Logical Fox

Food. Every living creature on Earth's most basic need. If one were to judge the most critical issue creating risk to humanity and nature, this would be undoubtedly at the top of the list. With a human population burgeoning and wildlife conservation holds ever shrinking, we are in store for a critical collision that ignores political borders, economic growth and commercial ambition. More than consumption of resources for energy, the relationship between commercial farming and preservation of biodiversity has reached tipping point, requiring integrated efforts toward scaled sustainable stakeholder processes.



The world's population, today numbering some 5.5 billion people, will likely have increased by about 2.5 billion to a total of 8 billion people by 2020. This is an increase of nearly 100 million a year. Over 93 percent of this growth will take place in the developing countries As such, the November 29-30, International Year of Biodiversity Conference at Lady Brabourne College in Kolkata, India could be considered the most important and ambitious gathering to protect and preserve the world's biodiversity and establish agricultural security to realize the goal of the elimination of poverty, malnourishment and inequality.



It is the opinion of PGI, and scores of others in the industry, that only though the integrated sustainable management of commercial agriculture, through the free transfer of technology and comprehensive stakeholder processes can humankind establish a coexistent balance with environmental services it relies on for survival and needed to preserve biodiversity.



The humble rural farmer and family is perhaps the most vulnerable to the myriad of new challenges that face the world current. Their issues are myriad: social and gender inequality, climate change, rising cost of farming, rampant migrations of alien plant and insect, unmitigated commercial development of farm land, decrepit farming infrastructure, lack of access to technology and increasing wildlife confrontation due to shrinking ecology reserves and gerrymandered native corridors. This list is not exhaustive but illustrates the tremendous challenge ahead for those stakeholders and accordingly policymakers and ultimately the consumer.



It has been the opinion of PGI, due to its deep experience in creating sustainable businesses for private clients, that the solution will not be found in government initiatives (albeit helpful) but in the able hands of those professionals who deeply understand their specialty vertical. Together these specializations can be stacked to form comprehensive integrated sustainable systems.



The term 'professional' here is used in its broadest definition- an individual who holds personal knowledge based on their endeavors and experience. Application of this definition happens to also promote equality. The farmer is a professional. The farmer's spouse is a professional. The biologist who develops the seed that lightens the farmer's burden is a professional. The marketer who takes the elite seed to the industry is a professional. Conservationists who understand the native ecology and society from village to village, city to city and region, all professionals. Each of these professionals must act in a coordinated manner, all mindful and respectful of the individual contribution of others, uncorrupted by greed or favoritism, and willing to communicate with other professionals who can suggest and implement meaningful processes of integration and coordinate risk-management efforts and transfer of information and technology.



It is with sincere hope that you will join us and bring your particular professional skill and experience to make the LBC-PGI International Year of Biodiversity gathering in Kolkata a meaningful and productive event. The subject matter is vast and accordingly the focus has been placed on two representative critical crops, bamboo and banana. Both key to agricultural viability and in need of sustainable processes to promote biodiversity. It will be a unique event in that invitees include those from the business, science, policy, education, youth and conservation sectors...all with the singular goal of discussing solutions, not just rehashing challenges. The time is now and the need for real change is critical.



If you cannot attend your generous direct or in-kind contribution toward the Conference costs can be coordinated by contacting the organizing committee joint treasurers Madhulika Gupta Chaudhuri or Sudipta Paul Bhattacharya, Asst. Professors , Dept of Microbiology , Lady Brabourne College: odditybiom@yahoo.com, 091 9830905534. Registration: http://www.ladybrabourne.com/notice.html





Sincerely,

Frank Costanzo
Managing Director

Peerless Green Initiatives

Joint Convenor , IYBD Kolkata

91 812 419 5292

Logo designed by students of LBC, Kolkata


Wednesday, November 10, 2010

India State Tamil Nadu Investing in Farmers as Stakeholders

Harvesting tech to making chips: A course for farmers


Nandu Sundaram
TNN

Coimbatore: If you are a potato farmer, you can now learn to make your own brand of chips. And get a bachelor’s degree in farm technology too. Everything from using the right seeds to the best harvesting

technology and making tasty finger chips will now be taught to farmers in Tamil Nadu through a three-year degree programme in Tamil. For the first time in the country, the Tamil Nadu Agricultural University (TNAU) is offering a degree programme for farmers who have dropped out of schools. All that the farmers need is a school leaving certificate that shows

that they have appeared for class X exam.

“Those who have appeared for class X public examination and are 30 years or above can apply,” said Dr V Valluva Paridasan, director, open and distance education, TNAU. The programme has already found quite a few takers. As many as 175 farmers have already applied for the course and admissions are open till the end of November.

One of them is 38-year-old D Ravishankar, who has taken 24 acres of land on lease at Thalavady near Sathyamangalam in Erode district and grows water melons along with his partner. “I have to run from pillar to post to find out about the right pesticide to apply or the right seed to use. I want to get into hi-tech farming. I am sure the course will give me the correct information on farming,” he said.

The six-semester bachelor’s degree in farm technology (BFTech) programme will include courses on agriculture, horticulture, soil science and seed technologies among others. Four courses will be offered in each semester. The curriculum would include field visits, study tours, demonstrations and hands-on training sessions. Dr Paridasan said the course was a first-ofits-kind in the country.

Launched on November 1, the distance education programme will offer relevant literature and other booklets to farmers. Contact classes will be held once or twice a month during the weekends at any of TNAU’s research centres. “If you are a farmer from Nagercoil, you will be asked to attend contact classes along with 20 to 40 other farmers at the horticulture research station in Pechiparai,” Dr Paridasan said.

nandu.sundaram@timesgroup.com

****


Tamil Nadu to introduce cluster farming to boost production of pulses


Chennai: The state department for agriculture is introducing cluster farming to increase the production of pulses in Tamil Nadu. Speaking at a conference held in the city on Wednesday on the challenges in the export of agricultural products, the principal secretary for agriculture, Dr P Rama Mohana Rao said, “This is the only model that can bring farmers together and improve the production of pulses. We have initiated a pilot project in Pudukottai over land spanning 1000 hectares, where a pulses cluster has been developed. Now we plan to develop clusters of 1000 hectares each in all 30 districts, amounting to 30,000 hectares of land under pulses cultivation.”

According to him, over 70 percent of the pulses consumed by the state is being imported. Till now, pulses was only cultivated as an intercrop along with groundnuts. The state agriculture department has been looking into methods and incentives to raise the produce. An official told TOI earlier that the 1000 hectare pilot project included new methods of cultivation and introduction of short duration variety seeds in pulses to encourage cultivation. Meanwhile, the department will also be setting up a lab for production of seeds with the support of the state government. These seeds will be sold to farmers at prices that are lower than market rate. “We will also be giving a subsidy of Rs 3,000 per hectare for seeds,” added Rao. “This will ensure quality food at competitive prices.” The department is also looking at acquiring land in Tindivanam and Ottenchaphiram near Coimbatore for the setting up of these labs, he said. TNN



Fair Use Notice: This post contains copyrighted material that has not been authorized by the copyright owners. PGI believes this educational use on the Green Eye Web-blog constitutes a fair use of the copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.) If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Fair Use notwithstanding we will immediately comply with any copyright owner who wants their material removed or modified or wants us to link to their web site which we routinely do as a business practice notwithstanding.

India-US To Work Mutually On Agriculture Technology

Addressing a joint session of Indian parliament, US President Barak Obama has announced United States help to India in order improve its weather forecasting systems, as both countries are likely to increase cooperation on agriculture technology in an effort to spark a second, more sustainable "Evergreen Revolution" in the South Asian nation.



As President Obama's visited India, and announced his government’s backing of India for a permanent seat on the U.N. Security Council, adding that the joint US-India technology would improve Indian weather forecasting systems before the next monsoon season.

India remains plagued by a high food inflation rate, which has stayed in the double digits after the worst drought in four years in 2009.

But the year-on-year food inflation rate decelerated to 12.85% in the week to Oct. 23 from 13.75% in the previous week.


In the sixties and seventies, the Indian government implemented a program to encourage high-yielding crops that eventually made the country self-sufficient for food for the first time. This came to be known as the Green Revolution.

http://oryza.com/Global-Rice/Rice-Research-News/India-US-To-Work-Mutually-On-Agriculture-Technology.html


Fair Use Notice: This post contains copyrighted material that has not been authorized by the copyright owners. PGI believes this educational use on the Green Eye Web-blog constitutes a fair use of the copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.) If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Fair Use notwithstanding we will immediately comply with any copyright owner who wants their material removed or modified or wants us to link to their web site which we routinely do as a business practice notwithstanding.

Tuesday, November 9, 2010

President Obama's Landmark Speech

"Mr Vice President, Madame Speaker, Mr. Prime Minister, Members of the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha, and most of all, the people of India.


I thank you for the great honor of addressing the representatives of more than one billion Indians and the world's largest democracy. I bring the greetings and friendship of the world's oldest democracy—the U.S.A, including nearly three million proud and patriotic Indian Americans.

Over the past three days, my wife Michelle and I have experienced the beauty and dynamism of India and its people. From the majesty of Humayun's Tomb to the advanced technologies that are empowering farmers and women who are the backbone of Indian society. From a Diwali celebration with schoolchildren to the innovators who are fueling India's economic rise. From the university students who will chart India's future, to you—leaders who helped to bring India to this moment of promise.

At every stop, we have been welcomed with the hospitality for which Indians have always been known. So to you and the people of India, on behalf of me, Michelle and the American people, please accept our deepest thanks. Bahoot dhanyavad.

I am not the first American president to visit India. Nor will I be the last. But I am proud to visit India so early in my presidency. It is no coincidence that India is my first stop on a visit to Asia, or that this has been my longest visit to another country since becoming President.

For in Asia and around the world, India is not simply emerging; India has already emerged. And it is my firm belief that the relationship between the United States and India—bound by our shared interests and values—will be one of the defining partnerships of the 21st century. This is the partnership I have come here to build. This is the vision that our nations can realize together.

My confidence in our shared future is grounded in my respect for India's treasured past—a civilization that has been shaping the world for thousands of years. Indians unlocked the intricacies of the human body and the vastness of our universe. And it is no exaggeration to say that our information age is rooted in Indian innovations—including the number zero.

India not only opened our minds, she expanded our moral imagination. With religious texts that still summon the faithful to lives of dignity and discipline. With poets who imagined a future "where the mind is without fear and the head is held high." And with a man whose message of love and justice endures—the Father of your Nation, Mahatma Gandhi.

For me and Michelle, this visit has therefore held special meaning. Throughout my life, including my work as a young man on behalf of the urban poor, I have always found inspiration in the life of Gandhiji and in his simple and profound lesson to be the change we seek in the world. And just as he summoned Indians to seek their destiny, he influenced champions of equality in my own country, including a young Martin Luther King. After making his pilgrimage to India a half century ago, Dr. King called Gandhi's philosophy of non-violent resistance "the only logical and moral approach" in the struggle for justice and progress.

So we were honored to visit the residence where Gandhi and King both stayed—Mani Bhavan. We were humbled to pay our respects at Raj Ghat. And I am mindful that I might not be standing before you today, as President of the United States, had it not been for Gandhi and the message he shared with America and the world.

An ancient civilization of science and innovation. A fundamental faith in human progress. This is the sturdy foundation upon which you have built ever since that stroke of midnight when the tricolor was raised over a free and independent India. And despite the skeptics who said that this country was simply too poor, too vast, too diverse to succeed, you surmounted overwhelming odds and became a model to the world.

Instead of slipping into starvation, you launched a Green Revolution that fed millions. Instead of becoming dependent on commodities and exports, you invested in science and technology and in your greatest resource—the Indian people. And the world sees the results, from the supercomputers you build to the Indian flag that you put on the moon.

Instead of resisting the global economy, you became one of its engines—reforming the licensingraj and unleashing an economic marvel that has lifted tens of millions from poverty and created one of the world's largest middle classes.

Instead of succumbing to division, you have shown that the strength of India—the very idea of India—is its embrace of all colors, castes and creeds. It's the diversity represented in this chamber today. It's the richness of faiths celebrated by a visitor to my hometown of Chicago more than a century ago—the renowned Swami Vivekananda. He said that, "holiness, purity and charity are not the exclusive possessions of any church in the world, and that every system has produced men and women of the most exalted character."

And instead of being lured by the false notion that progress must come at the expense of freedom, you built the institutions upon which true democracy depends—free and fair elections, which enable citizens to choose their own leaders without recourse to arms; an independent judiciary and the rule of law, which allows people to address their grievances; and a thriving free press and vibrant civil society which allows every voice to be heard. And this year, as India marks 60 years with a strong and democratic constitution, the lesson is clear: India has succeeded, not in spite of democracy; India has succeeded because of democracy.

Just as India has changed, so too has the relationship between our two nations. In the decades after independence, India advanced its interests as a proud leader of the nonaligned movement. Yet too often, the United States and India found ourselves on opposite sides of a North-South divide and estranged by a long Cold War. Those days are over.

Here in India, two successive governments led by different parties have recognized that deeper partnership with America is both natural and necessary. In the United States, both of my predecessors—one Democrat, one Republican—worked to bring us closer, leading to increased trade and a landmark civil nuclear agreement.

Since then, people in both our countries have asked: what next? How can we build on this progress and realize the full potential of our partnership? That is what I want to address today—the future that the United States seeks in an interconnected world; why I believe that India is indispensable to this vision; and how we can forge a truly global partnership—not in just one or two areas, but across many; not just for our mutual benefit, but for the world's.

Of course, only Indians can determine India's national interests and how to advance them on the world stage. But I stand before you today because I am convinced that the interests of the United States—and the interests we share with India—are best advanced in partnership.

The United States seeks security—the security of our country, allies and partners. We seek prosperity—a strong and growing economy in an open international economic system. We seek respect for universal values. And we seek a just and sustainable international order that promotes peace and security by meeting global challenges through stronger global cooperation.

To advance these interests, I have committed the United States to comprehensive engagement with the world, based on mutual interest and mutual respect. And a central pillar of this engagement is forging deeper cooperation with 21st century centers of influence—and that includes India. This is why I believe that India and America are indispensable partners in meeting the challenges of our time.

Since taking office, I've therefore made our relationship a priority. I was proud to welcome Prime Minister Singh for the first official state visit of my presidency. For the first time ever, our governments are working together across the whole range of common challenges we face. And let me say it as clearly as I can: the United States not only welcomes India as a rising global power, we fervently support it, and we have worked to help make it a reality.

Together with our partners, we have made the G20 the premier forum for international economic cooperation, bringing more voices to the table of global economic decision-making, including India. We have increased the role of emerging economies like India at international financial institutions. We valued India's important role at Copenhagen, where, for the first time, all major economies committed to take action to confront climate change—and to stand by those actions. We salute India's long history as a leading contributor to United Nations peacekeeping missions. And we welcome India as it prepares to take its seat on the United Nations Security Council.

In short, with India assuming its rightful place in the world, we have an historic opportunity to make the relationship between our two countries a defining partnership of the century ahead. And I believe we can do so by working together in three important areas.

First, as global partners we can promote prosperity in both our countries. Together, we can create the high-tech, high-wage jobs of the future. With my visit, we are now ready to begin implementing our civil nuclear agreement. This will help meet India's growing energy needs and create thousands of jobs in both our countries.

We need to forge partnerships in high-tech sectors like defense and civil space. So we have removed Indian organizations from our so-called "entity list." And we'll work to reform our controls on exports. Both of these steps will ensure that Indian companies seeking high-tech trade and technologies from America are treated the same as our closest allies and partners.

We can pursue joint research and development to create green jobs; give Indians more access to cleaner, affordable energy; meet the commitments we made at Copenhagen; and show the possibilities of low-carbon growth.

Together, we can resist the protectionism that stifles growth and innovation. The United States remains—and will continue to remain—one of the most open economies in the world. And by opening markets and reducing barriers to foreign investment, India can realize its full economic potential as well. As G20 partners, we can make sure the global economic recovery is strong and durable. And we can keep striving for a Doha Round that is ambitious and balanced—with the courage to make the compromises that are necessary so global trade works for all economies.

Together, we can strengthen agriculture. Cooperation between Indian and American researchers and scientists sparked the Green Revolution. Today, India is a leader in using technology to empower farmers, like those I met yesterday who get free updates on market and weather conditions on their cell phones. And the United States is a leader in agricultural productivity and research. Now, as farmers and rural areas face the effects of climate change and drought, we'll work together to spark a second, more sustainable Evergreen Revolution.

Together, we're going to improve Indian weather forecasting systems before the next monsoon season. We aim to help millions of Indian farming households save water and increase productivity; improve food processing so crops don't spoil on the way to market; and enhance climate and crop forecasting to avoid losses that cripple communities and drive up food prices.

Because the wealth of a nation also depends on the health of its people, we'll continue to support India's efforts against diseases like tuberculosis and HIV/AIDS, and as global partners, we'll work to improve global health by preventing the spread of pandemic flu. And because knowledge is the currency of the 21st century, we'll increase exchanges between our students, colleges and universities, which are among the best in the world.

As we work to advance our shared prosperity, we can partner to address a second priority—our shared security. In Mumbai [ Images ], I met with the courageous families and survivors of that barbaric attack. And here in this Parliament, which was itself targeted because of the democracy it represents, we honor the memory of all those who have been taken from us, including American citizens on 26/11 and Indian citizens on 9/11.

This is the bond we share. It's why we insist that nothing ever justifies the slaughter of innocent men, women and children. It's why we're working together, more closely than ever, to prevent terrorist attacks and to deepen our cooperation even further. And it's why, as strong and resilient societies, we refuse to live in fear, we will not sacrifice the values and rule of law that defines us, and we will never waver in the defense of our people.

America's fight against al Qaeda and its terrorist affiliates is why we persevere in Afghanistan, where major development assistance from India has improved the lives of the Afghan people. We're making progress in our mission to break the Taliban's [ Images ] momentum and to train Afghan forces so they can take the lead for their security. And while I have made it clear that American forces will begin the transition to Afghan responsibility next summer, I have also made it clear that America's commitment to the Afghan people will endure. The United States will not abandon the people of Afghanistan—or the region—to the violent extremists who threaten us all.

Our strategy to disrupt, dismantle and defeat al Qaeda and its affiliates has to succeed on both sides of the border. That is why we have worked with the Pakistani government to address the threat of terrorist networks in the border region. The Pakistani government increasingly recognizes that these networks are not just a threat outside of Pakistan—they are a threat to the Pakistani people, who have suffered greatly at the hands of violent extremists.

And we will continue to insist to Pakistan's leaders that terrorist safe-havens within their borders are unacceptable, and that the terrorists behind the Mumbai attacks be brought to justice. We must also recognize that all of us have and interest in both an Afghanistan and a Pakistan that is stable, prosperous and democratic—and none more so than India.

More broadly, India and the United States can partner in Asia. Today, the United States is once again playing a leadership role in Asia—strengthening old alliances; deepening relationships, as we are doing with China; and we're reengaging with regional organizations like ASEAN and joining the East Asia summit—organizations in which India is also a partner. Like your neighbors in Southeast Asia, we want India to not only "look East," we want India to "engage East"—because it will increase the security and prosperity of all our nations.

And as two global leaders, the United States and India can partner for global security—especially as India serves on the Security Council over the next two years. Indeed, the just and sustainable international order that America seeks includes a United Nations that is efficient, effective, credible and legitimate. That is why I can say today—in the years ahead, I look forward to a reformed U.N. Security Council that includes India as a permanent member.

Now, let me suggest that with increased power comes increased responsibility. The United Nations exists to fulfill its founding ideals of preserving peace and security, promoting global cooperation, and advancing human rights. These are the responsibilities of all nations, but especially those that seek to lead in the 21st century. And so we look forward to working with India—and other nations that aspire to Security Council membership—to ensure that the Security Council is effective; that resolutions are implemented and sanctions enforced; and that we strengthen the international norms which recognize the rights and responsibilities of all nations and individuals.

This includes our responsibility to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons. Since I took office, the United States has reduced the role of nuclear weapons in our national security strategy, and agreed with Russia [ Images ] to reduce our arsenals. We have put preventing nuclear proliferation and nuclear terrorism at the top of our nuclear agenda, and strengthened the cornerstone of the global non-proliferation regime—the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.

Together, the United States and India can pursue our goal of securing the world's vulnerable nuclear materials. We can make it clear that even as every nation has the right to peaceful nuclear energy, every nation must also meet its international obligations—and that includes the Islamic Republic of Iran. And together, we can pursue a vision that Indian leaders have espoused since independence—a world without nuclear weapons.

This leads me to the final area where our countries can partner—strengthening the foundations of democratic governance, not only at home but abroad.

Now, in a new collaboration on open government, our two countries are going to share our experience, identify what works, and develop the next-generation of tools to empower citizens. And in another example of how American and Indian partnership can address global challenges, we're going to share these innovations with civil society groups and countries around the world. We're going to show that democracy, more than any other form of government, delivers for the common man—and woman.

As the world's two largest democracies, we must also never forget that the price of our own freedom is standing up for the freedom of others. Indians know this, for it is the story of your nation. Before he ever began his struggle for Indian independence, Gandhi stood up for the rights of Indians in South Africa [ Images ]. Just as others, including the United States, supported Indian independence, India championed the self-determination of peoples from Africa to Asia as they too broke free from colonialism. And along with the United States, you've been a leader in supporting democratic development and civil society groups around the world. This, too, is part of India's greatness.

Every country will follow its own path. No one nation has a monopoly on wisdom, and no nation should ever try to impose its values on another. But when peaceful democratic movements are suppressed—as in Burma—then the democracies of the world cannot remain silent. For it is unacceptable to gun down peaceful protestors and incarcerate political prisoners decade after decade. It is unacceptable to hold the aspirations of an entire people hostage to the greed and paranoia of a bankrupt regime. It is unacceptable to steal an election, as the regime in Burma has done again for all the world to see.

Faced with such gross violations of human rights, it is the responsibility of the international community—especially leaders like the United States and India—to condemn it. If I can be frank, in international fora, India has often avoided these issues. But speaking up for those who cannot do so for themselves is not interfering in the affairs of other countries. It's not violating the rights of sovereign nations. It's staying true to our democratic principles. It's giving meaning to the human rights that we say are universal. And it sustains the progress that in Asia and around the world has helped turn dictatorships into democracies and ultimately increased our security in the world.

Promoting shared prosperity. Preserving peace and security. Strengthening democratic governance and human rights. These are the responsibilities of leadership. And, as global partners, this is the leadership that the United States and India can offer in the 21st century. Ultimately, however, this cannot be a relationship only between presidents and prime ministers, or in the halls of this parliament. Ultimately, this must be a partnership between our peoples. So I want to conclude by speaking directly to the people of India watching today.

In your lives, you have overcome odds that might have overwhelmed a lesser country. In just decades, you have achieved progress and development that took other nations centuries. And now you are assuming your rightful place as a leader among nations. Your parents and grandparents imagined this. Your children and grandchildren will look back on this. But only you—this generation of Indians—can seize the possibility of this moment.

As you carry on with the hard work ahead, I want every Indian citizen to know: the United States of America will not simply be cheering you on from the sidelines. We will be right there with you, shoulder to shoulder. Because we believe in the promise of India. And we believe that the future is what we make it.


We believe that no matter who you are or where you come from, every person can fulfill their God-given potential, just as a Dalit like Dr. Ambedkar could lift himself up and pen the words of the Constitution that protects the rights of all Indians.

We believe that no matter where you live—whether a village in Punjab [ Images ] or the bylanes of Chandni Chowk…an old section of Kolkata [ Images ] or a new high-rise in Bangalore—every person deserves the same chance to live in security and dignity, to get an education, to find work, and to give their children a better future.

And we believe that when countries and cultures put aside old habits and attitudes that keep people apart, when we recognize our common humanity, then we can begin to fulfill the aspirations we share. It's a simple lesson contained in that collection of stories which has guided Indians for centuries—the Panchtantra. And it's the spirit of the inscription seen by all who enter this great hall: 'That one is mine and the other a stranger is the concept of little minds. But to the large-hearted, the world itself is their family."

This is the story of India; it's the story of America—that despite their differences, people can see themselves in one another, and work together and succeed together as one proud nation. And it can be the spirit of the partnership between our nations—that even as we honor the histories which in different times kept us apart, even as we preserve what makes us unique in a globalized world, we can recognize how much we can achieve together.

Thank you, Jai Hind!, and long live the partnership between India and the United States



Fair Use Notice: This post contains copyrighted material that has not been authorized by the copyright owners. PGI believes this educational use on the Green Eye Web-blog constitutes a fair use of the copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.) If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Fair Use notwithstanding we will immediately comply with any copyright owner who wants their material removed or modified or wants us to link to their web site which we routinely do as a business practice notwithstanding.

Sunday, October 31, 2010

Economics of Sequestering Carbon in the U.S. Agricultural Sector


Economics of Sequestering Carbon in the U.S. Agricultural Sector. By Jan
Lewandrowski, Carol Jones, and Robert House, Resource Economics Division,
Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture; Mark Peters,
Agricultural Marketing Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture; Mark Sperow,West
Virginia University; and Marlen Eve and Keith Paustian, Natural Resource Ecology
Laboratory and Colorado State University. Technical Bulletin No. 1909.

____
Strategies that have been proposed to mitigate global climate change typically
focus on reducing energy-related emissions of greenhouse gases (including carbon
dioxide) into the atmosphere. But atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases
also can be reduced by withdrawing carbon from the atmosphere and storing, or
sequestering, it in soils and biomass. In examining the economics of sequestering
carbon in the U.S. farm sector through changes in agricultural land use and
management practices, this study focuses on two questions:
How much of the estimated “technical” potential for carbon sequestration
is economically feasible?
How cost effective are alternative designs for incentive payments that
might be used to encourage carbon-sequestering activities?
Model-based findings reflect the provision of financial incentives to landowners
for sequestering carbon through changes in land use (converting cropland to forest
or grassland) and cropland management practices (adopting conservation tillage or
alternative crop rotations):
Agriculture can provide low-cost opportunities to sequester additional
carbon in soils and biomass. At a price of $10 per metric ton for permanently
sequestered carbon, the ERS model estimates that from 0.4 to 10 MMT of carbon
could be sequestered annually from adoption of the land-use changes or
management practices analyzed; and at $125 per ton, from 72 to 160 MMT
could be sequestered, enough to offset 4 to 8 percent of gross U.S. emissions of
greenhouse gases in 2001.
The different sequestration activities studied become economically feasible
at different carbon prices. The model predicted that farmers would adopt cropland
management (primarily conservation tillage) at the lowest carbon price, $10
per metric ton permanently sequestered carbon, and would convert land to forest
as the price rose to $25 and beyond. The model predicted farmers in most
regions would not convert cropland to grassland up through a $125 carbon price
(in the absence of other incentives, such as Conservation Reserve Program payments),
in part because conversion to afforestation was more profitable with its
higher sequestration rate per acre. These estimates are comparable with estimates
in earlier studies.
The estimated economic potential to sequester carbon is lower than previously
estimated technical possibilities. Soil scientists have estimated that
increased adoption of conservation tillage on U.S. cropland has the technical
potential to sequester as much as 107 million metric tons (MMT) additional carbon.
The ERS model estimates economic potential by factoring into farmers’
adoption decisions the tradeoff between the additional costs of sequestering
practices, relative to the additional returns from the per ton carbon payments. We
estimate that farmers could sequester up to an additional 28 MMT by adopting
conservation tillage on additional lands at the top carbon price we studied, $125
per ton. For the other activities studied—afforestation and, particularly, for
conversion to grassland—the estimated economic potential also was less than
the literature estimates of technical potential.
vi Economics of Sequestering Carbon in the U.S. Agricultural Sector / TB-1909 Economic Research Service/USDA
Incremental sequestration from agricultural activities can continue for
decades. Conversion to conservation tillage could sequester additional soil carbon
for 20-30 years, at which point a new equilibrium level of soil carbon would be
attained. But carbon may be released relatively rapidly if farmers shift back to
conventional tillage. Additional sequestration from afforestation may continue for
many more decades, depending on region, species of trees, and harvest decisions.
These findings have implications for policy:
Payments for carbon sequestration may exceed their value if sequestration
is not permanent. To have the same greenhouse gas mitigation value as a unit
of carbon emissions reduction, a unit of additional carbon sequestration must
remain stored in soils or biomass permanently. If a program makes per ton payments
equal to the value of permanent sequestration (“asset” payments), overpayments
will occur if subsequent changes in land use or management practices
release carbon back into the atmosphere—unless compensation is adjusted for
the releases. “Rental” payment mechanisms, which pay farmers to store carbon
for specific periods by maintaining carbon-sequestering practices, can help avoid
this problem—particularly for contract renewals after the period when a new
equilibrium level of soil carbon is reached and no more carbon is being added to
the soil.
An incentive system that includes both payments for carbon sequestration
and charges for carbon emissions may be much more cost effective than a
system with payments only. For example, at a carbon price of $125 per ton of
permanently sequestered carbon, changes in tillage practices account for 7 MMT
of additional sequestered carbon with a rental payment system that includes both
payments and charges. Annual government expenditures for storage of this carbon
during the 15-year contract period total $300 million. In contrast, when the incentives
include only carbon payments, a price of $125 per ton results in half the
sequestered carbon (3.5 MMT), while annual government expenditures increase
tenfold to $1.5 billion.
Adding a cost-share subsidy does not appear to improve the cost effectiveness
of incentive systems. A 50-percent cost-share for cropland conversion to forestry
or grasslands would increase sequestration at low carbon payment levels but not at
high payment levels. The implications for cost per ton are minimal.


Fair Use Notice: This post contains copyrighted material that has not been authorized by the copyright owners. PGI believes this educational use on the Green Eye Web-blog constitutes a fair use of the copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.) If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Fair Use notwithstanding we will immediately comply with any copyright owner who wants their material removed or modified or wants us to link to their web site which we routinely do as a business practice notwithstanding.